Energotehnica: Primacy and Effective Judicial Protection Beyond the Rule of Law Crisis

Energotehnica: Primacy and Effective Judicial Protection Beyond the Rule of Law Crisis

Orlando Scarcello

Case C-792/22, Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Rupea and Others v. MG, Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024, ECLI:EU:C:2024:788.

The Energotehnica judgment (C-792/22) reaffirms the primacy of EU law over national constitutional court rulings, explicitly declaring Romania’s Constitutional Court decision on the binding force of administrative findings in criminal proceedings incompatible with EU law. The Court emphasized the right to effective judicial protection under Article 47 of the Charter, invalidating procedural practices excluding parties from critical administrative proceedings. Additionally, the judgment addressed whether Romanian judges could face disciplinary sanctions for disapplying national constitutional decisions to uphold EU law, confirming that such sanctions violate EU principles. This ruling strengthens fair trial standards and judicial independence within the EU legal order.


Download pdf

ISSN: 2036-5438
Centro Studi Federalismo

© 2001 - 2023 - Centro Studi sul Federalismo - Codice Fiscale 94067130016

Fondazione Compagnia San Paolo
The activities of the Centre for Studies on Federalism are  accomplished thanks to the support of Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo
Fondazione Collegio Carlo Alberto
Our thanks to Fondazione Collegio Carlo Alberto