Warning

Commanders-in-chief beyond the border: analysing the powers of heads of state in Northern American federalism

Written by Tiago de Melo Cartaxo   
Canada and the United States of America are examples of how two constitutional systems in the same region may adopt substantially different solutions in respect of the powers of the head of state. While the United States Founding Fathers opted to follow a republican and presidential path, the Canadian constitutional system developed a framework under the British monarchic background, in part as a rejection of their neighbour country’s federal and constitutional choices. This article proceeds with a comparison between both systems of Northern America, demonstrating that the powers of heads of state may vary, even between countries which were historically influenced by the same constitutional and democratic traditions, but, as a result of a multitude of historical and cultural influences, decided to follow different constitutional pathways.
Download this file (download.pdf)download521 Kb
Comments
Add New comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

Published on Monday, 24 July 2017 08:49
Last Updated ( Thursday, 27 July 2017 06:14 )
 
© 2009 - 2012 - Centro Studi sul Federalismo - P. IVA 94067130016